Latest entry
Supreme Court orders states to frame early-release policy for elderly and terminally ill prisoners.
16 Jul 2026
Timeline
-
Supreme Court
Supreme Court orders states to frame early-release policy for elderly and terminally ill prisoners123
On 16 July 2026 a Supreme Court bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, directed all states and UTs to frame a policy for early release of elderly and terminally ill prisoners within three months. The policy must be framed with State Legal Services Authorities, give a uniform definition of terminal illness, set up independent medical boards and use the e-Prisons portal; compliance affidavits are due in six months and the matter is listed on 19 January 2027.
- On 16 July 2026 a Supreme Court bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, directed all states and UTs to frame a policy for early release of elderly and terminally ill prisoners within three months
- The policy must be framed with State Legal Services Authorities, give a uniform definition of terminal illness, set up independent medical boards and use the e-Prisons portal; compliance affidavits are due in six months and the matter is listed on 19 January 2027
-
Supreme Court
Delhi High Court frames Right to be Forgotten rules for online court records456
Justice Sachin Datta held the right flows from informational privacy under Article 21 and set a de-indexing and masking framework for judicial records.
- Delhi High Court (Justice Sachin Datta) held that the right to be forgotten is a facet of informational privacy under Article 21
- 144-page judgment delivered on 29 May 2026 in a batch of writ petitions
- Laid down a framework for de-indexing and masking personal information in online judicial records
- Search engines cannot be perpetually allowed to show judicial records in name-based searches for private cases ending in acquittal, discharge, quashing or settlement
-
Supreme Court
Supreme Court holds menstrual health part of the right to life under Article 21789
In Dr Jaya Thakur v Union of India on 30 January a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan read menstrual health into Article 21 and directed all states and UTs to provide gender-segregated toilets and free sanitary napkins in government and private schools, with de-recognition threatened for non-compliance.
- Judgment dated 30 January 2026 in Dr Jaya Thakur v Government of India (2026 INSC 97)
- Bench: Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan
- Right to menstrual health read into Article 21, with Articles 14 and 21A
- Free biodegradable sanitary napkins for girls in Classes 6-12 and functional gender-segregated toilets in schools
- Continuing mandamus issued to the Union and states
Exercise.Quizzes on Article 21 and every other topic arrive on Telegram six times a day, and what you get wrong comes back.
Practise on Telegram